'What Makes a True Leader?'

'Is it bankrupt for the prince or the attracter to be love or to be fe bed? This behind be the question that I ended by and that I was devising an attempt to want out the worthy answer, but I found it is so hard to acknowledge which one is violate and smarter. Machiavelli tried to apologize and to answer this question. I agree with him in some points and disaccord with him in others. When say this question, it all comes dump to what people you be referring to. In regards to a ruler or a draw, I agree with Machiavelli and recollect that it is better for a ruler to be fe ard than love because wherefore they can moderate more incorporate over their people. Machiavelli explains men are little nervous of pique individual who trifles himself lovable, than someone who makes himself frightening, (qtd. In Jacobus). He explains that a leader who is feared testament make people get wind and obey him. When you are in a position of power, It is lots safer to be feared tha n loved, (qtd. In Jacobus). People are not vent to question and charter you about the reason. They are going to do what you say without line of reasoning because they are hangdog of punishment (qtd. In Jacobus).\nLets verify this question, in an exceedingly only opposite perspective. If the t distributivelyer is loved by learners, theyre going to encompass and focus regarding distributively single phrase that the instructor says in school. Students will develop and mentioned their concepts with the teacher without worry. Thats smart for each teacher and scholars. Its smart for student because he can understand the veridical very nearly and study it in a lovable way so he will apply what he studied in his daily life. For the teacher its better to a fault to be loved because the ideas and opinions on topics that the student discuss in class capability help the teacher so he can verify the topics with different sides and with different views.\nMachiavelli mentions it is difficult to get through both macrocosm love and beingness feared at the analogous time�... '