.

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Differences between massachusetts and virginia 1607 and 1750 Essay

twain the economics and politics greatly differed between Massachusetts and Virginia between 1607 and 1750. The differences in the percentage of classes were unbelievably large and their entire economic structure differed from to each one other. Virginia had more than(prenominal) risky culture and economics where-as Massachusetts had a more stable miserliness. The economy of Virginia was based solely on the production of tobacco. The grove geters had to buy slaves to work the fields so the slave trade industriousness in Virginia was also a huge factor. The plantation owners were in the very rich, elite category and pretty much ran the politics. Virginia had a ridiculously meek middle class and they barely had any say in the elections.The scummy classes of Virginia were about 80%of the population and were not even allowed to vote. This made the deposit/colony of Virginia a very un-democratic and un-representative. There was very little specie flow in Virginia because the e lite plantation owners flaunted their wealth as a display of power. This was necessary because this display of power kept the slaves and poor concourse of the community from revolting. The economy of Virginia was very fragile and brittle. All it would have interpreted was one drought or one bad tobacco family and Virginia would have been severely hurt economically.The Northern colonies, especially Massachusetts, were much more stable. There was a larger middle class of 65% and at that place was much more representation in politics in Massachusetts. The economy was much more stable because it didnt only rely on one form of income. Because there were many harbors in Massachusetts there were more towns which led to the need of new professions. There included Blacksmiths, article of clothing makers, Merchants, and sailors. There was also much more notes flow in Massachusetts because there was no need to flaunt wealth and a much larger middle class. Another reason for the greater a mounts of cash flow was that the people that lived in Massachusetts were mostly Puritan.The Puritans believed that you should not come out your wealth because it was temptation and temptation was a sin. The Puritans were extremely hard-working and that is one of the of import reasons the Northern colonies were so successful. The Northern colonies and the Southern colonies differed in many ship canal but both succeeded in the long run. They may have had diametric views and completely different economies but both sides will play their own part in the revolution and eventually become onecountry. The unfastened States of America.

No comments:

Post a Comment