Foundation of Leadership Essay

How do draws of today draw what they be now? What experiences did they g adept through in stabilizing their foundations of intimately and ideal leaders? There atomic number 18 just too umpteen aspects in life that on the wholeow mold you to become an efficient leader. any experience, person you entrust meet, and their ideals will contribute to create a leader out of you. 1. Create a diagram that demonstrates the interplay of your life. Include the aspects that you think are important. The diagram shows how an individual gain his skills and live guidege through social interaction. ad hominem experiences teach an individual what to do and what he will become in the future. The relationship and interaction with the people around you mold and stabilize your character. The feat and experience that you moderate or have been engaged in will create the kind of leader you are or shadow be after surpassing circumstances and pressures. Your goals and desires will determine how far you can go. 2. What principles surfaced to you from your readings of Synchronicity? To what extent have you practiced any or all of the disciplines in the context of your personal life?Synchronicity, a book pen by Joseph Jaworski, also discussed about important insights in leading. He toasted the revalue of servant leadership wherein in an organization an individual is after the root word instead of ones self interest. Servant leaders should live on how to listen, empathize, be aware, heal himself and the members, conceptualize, foresee, persuade, commit, and build his community. Servant leaders should also pick out how to keep the harmonious relationship among members. From my own experience, I have proved that servant leadership works.A leader who values the group members and their whim has too far to go in leading. Listening, empathy and awareness are rattling important. Moreover, respect is also being gained in return. You can also boom out and develop ideas throug h brainstorming. Jaworski also discussed the importance of advance planning and conceptualizing. You will be able to estimate and assume future events and circumstances, enabling you to survive what to do or avoid in the future. Learning from the past is also important, past experiences can be ones pattern in decision-making. leading skills can be developed and improved through ones knowledge and experiences. Different styles can be used depending on the situation for a more(prenominal) efficient results, only proper decision-making should be done wisely. To be knowledgeable and ideal leader, look the world and get wind more things in life. Be responsible. 3. Locate one or more websites and journals that explore leadership traits and styles, and discuss management and leadership. A group of researchers led by Kurt Lewin, conducted an experiment in order to study and identify circumstantial types of leadership.In result, the group established three major types the authoritarian leadership (autocratic), Participative (democratic), and delegative (laissez-faire). (Kendra Van Wagner) In authoritarian leadership, clear expectations of all the details is provided much(prenominal) as what, when, and where something should be done. Leaders decide independently with a microscopic contribution from the rest of the group, or even nothing at all. In this type of leadership, less creativity in decision-making is being formed by the group.However, it is applicable in situations wherein there is minimal time for group intervention or when the leader is the most knowledgable and reliable member of the group. (Kendra Van Wagner) Participative leadership allows everyone to take part in the discussion and decision-making processes and is guided by the leader. The output signal of the work lead by democratic leaders is more creative. Members are being more motivated and creative as the leader boost them to participate, but preserve the final decision to him.(Kendra Van Wagner) Members under delegative leadership work independently with a little or no commission at all from the leader and leave decision-making to the rest of the group. On the another(prenominal) hand, this style can be useful for members that are highly satisfactory in an area of proficiency, but frequently results into weakly defined roles and neglect of enthusiasm. (Kendra Van Wagner) leadership goes hand in hand with management. Though the 2 are inseparable terms, it is important to know the distinction between them.Leadership deals with the concept and rationale while management is into the logistic details such(prenominal) as who, when and when. Leaders direct the organizarion while managers handle the process towards a certain goal. Leaders motivate others to go beyond their limit and explore whereas managers make others do what they need to do. Managers are focused on present circumstances leaders conentrate on conceptualizing and foreseeing. Leaders plan managers make things done. They have different jobs and responsibillities, yet the two are directly linked to each other.How can you plan for the future and lead if you dont know how to manage and work things out? (Webb)Works Cited Jaworski, Joseph. Synchronicity The Inner course of Leadership . Berrett-Koehler Publishers 1st ed edition , March 1996. Kendra Van Wagner. Leadership Theories. 2007. About. com. 26 September 2007 . Webb, Bert. My Two Cents Leadership vs. Management. 26 September 2007 .