Nature and nurture shape our personalities

Each individual is unique and a somebody of value under his/her own right. This statement defines who a soulfulness is, one s send awayowed with the faculties to exist and be a contri howevering member of society. However, how a person develops trustworthy characteristics and traits book aroused the curiosity of the scientific and donnish community. Even p arnts want to know how personalities atomic number 18 certain so they would be qualified to rear their children in the proper way and twist adults who concord a well rounded genius.The questions remains, how do people develop their personalities and what factors solve it. Although some people believe that personalities argon influenced by rear magic spell others believe that personalities are influenced by disposition, but it is a combination of twain nature and upbringing that shape our personalities. The nature-nurture contr oversy has led to the different locatings on how an individuals record develops.Rele vant materials The Boy Who Became a missyThe nature aspect says that a person comes into this world with a trusted traits and characteristics which make him/her predisposed to behave and think in a certain way. The nature perspective is largely biological and genetic wherein it is thought that personality is often passed from parents to offspring and that a child whitethorn inherit the traits of the parents (Carlson & Buskist, 1997) fitting as they inherit their fathers eyes or their stimulates skin. Moreover, the biological perspective has said that a child is already born with certain personality traits that are enduring and stable over time.If a child has a difficult temperament as a baby, it brush aside be expected that as an adult, that child would still be moody and temperamental. Finally, the nature perspective says that personality types are based on the gene pool of the individual, they say that aggression or predisposition to delirium is genetically based, some peop le are just born to have the raging gene and that there is nonhing that can be do to deepen this (Friedman & Schustack, 2006). The nature perspective may seem to be deterministic and narrow, once a person is said to be shy or timid, then that person will always be shy until the end of his/her life.The nurture perspective was borne out of the reaction and revolt against the nature perspective, the proponents of the nurture perspective found the biological view close and incomplete, it was not able to account for the concept of choice and free will and that each person has the capacity to change and become better persons. The nurture perspective advocated that individuals are fundamentally good and that each person can be skilled and influenced to be a better person or have positivistic personality traits (Friedman & Schustack, 2006).Therefore, a person may come from a family of criminals or psychotics but with the right nurturing surroundings and love and care the child can gr ow up to become morally upright and compassionate. The nurture perspective places greater importance to the quality of care and the kind of surround that a child receives during his/her early years can presume the childs personality and will form his/her characteristics and traits.The nurture perspective does not release for any biological influence, in fact John B. Watson in his famed declaration has been known to say that he can train children to become whatever he desires them to be (Friedman & Schustack, 2006). The nurture perspective is more confirming as compared to the nature perspective when it comes to personality change. The perspective holds that each person with the right support and guidance will be able to change his/her personality traits for the better.As the nature-nurture debate wore on, scientists and philosophers were finding evidence that suggested that personality learning is not solely nature nor nurture, but a combination of both perspectives. Relying on the nature perspective alone does not defer a complete take in of how personality is developed. They say that personality traits are not observable and one cannot identify which gene carries what trait therefore the perspective lacked credence as traits are not adequately labeled. At the aforementioned(prenominal) time, saying that the environment alone is the sole influence that affects personality growth is wrong. There is always the continued interplay between nature and nurture and in reality personality is molded by the combination of these two counterpoint views. temperament traits and characteristics are developed and molded by both nature and nurture factors wherein the individual finds him/her self. It is true that ones biological traits affect the individual and can be used as basis to indicate the mien of the child in the future as well as what kind of personality he/she will have. Personality traits that are acquit through emotions have been found to be affecte d by the endorphins and the hormones that a person has (Carlson & Buskist, 1997).For example, men and women differ in their personalities because women have more oestrogen which activates the body into being more emotional and easily affected by feelings and situations temporary hookup men who have a very low estrogen levels are hardier, more composed and calm than women.The physiology of the human mindset besides influence the personality of the individual (Carlson & Buskist, 1997), those who have a more developed language area are more vocal, more able to express their emotions while those who have more developed logical area are more rational. Moreover, intelligence which is a key ingredient of a persons personality is as well genetically based, those who are highly dexterous will be more critical, more resilient and more introverted while those who are more socially adept will race to be extroverted.The influence of the environment over the personality of the individual h as been demonstrate by the number of cases of wherein the child has been brought up in a positive environment despite being borne in a dysfunctional family grew up to be straight and proper. In the earliest experiments of human contact which tackles the fare of nurture it was found that rogues reared alone and without a nurturing mother was cold, lifeless and unavailing to relate with other monkeys.On the other hand, a monkey which was reared unneurotic with a mechanical monkey displayed more positive behaviors than the first monkey (Westen, 2003). This showed that a nurturing environment is important for the developing child, in a equivalent light it was found that those children who were exposed to aggression withal imitated the aggressive behavior that was shown to them (Huesmann, Moise-Titus, Podolski & Eron, 2003). These underscores the double edged sword that nurture is because a positive environment may lead to positive outcomes while a negative environment may also be a threat to the development of the child.However, pickings both of the perspectives explains far more completely how personality is developed and formed. A childs genetic make-up provides for the predispositions that a child has, while the kind of environment that he/she grows up in will also form part of his/her personality. Personality tests have often found that personality traits are stable and enduring (Westen, 2003), a child may be stubborn in his/her younger age may mellow squander and with the societal influences and an environment that promotes respect and obedience may tame the stubbornness, but in the end, his/her stubbornness may prevail when placed in a difficult situation or when she has to cope with a certain subject area or problem.Moreover, a child may be overly lively and vocal since childhood but through experience and social forces may transform the child into an adult who excels in sports or who are activists and leaders. This is also true for the other side of personality, the evil and dark side. Some children are evil and these can be observed in their behavior towards other children or other creatures, and sometimes they grow up to be criminals and sociopaths (Westen, 2003). In a same vein, children who have experienced abuse and traumatic events melt down to develop personality disorders that affect their quality of life and dealinghips.Lastly, it has been reported that injuries to the brain have often resulted to a change in personality (Westen, 2003) and these had inauspicious effects to the individual and his/her family. The persons behavior becomes erratic he/she may have mood swings or may even gift a personality that is completely uncharacteristic of him/her.Without a doubt, personality is cause by ones biological predispositions and environment, each one of us have heard a small voice inside of us that shares our thoughts and feelings, while the most important persons in our lives have influenced and inspired us to drea m and fulfill our ambitions in life. In the past the nature versus nurture debate was intensely championed by both sides, but at present it has been realized that acknowledging both the nature and nurture aspect of ones development and personality provides a more complete and accurate picture of human nature.ReferencesCarlson N. & Buskist W. (1997). Psychology The Science of Behavior 5th ed. Boston Allyn andBacon.Friedman, H. & Schustack, M. (2006). Personality Classic theories and modernResearch 3rd ed. Boston Allyn & Bacon.Huesmann, L., Moise-Titus, J., Podolski, C. & Eron, L. (2003). Longitudinal relationsbetween childrens exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood 1977-1992. Developmental Psychology, 39, 201-221.Westen, D. (2003). Psychology Brain, Behavior, and Culture. unsanded York Wiley & Sons.